Having paid more than £26,000 a couple of years ago to build a bat sanctuary above my stables, I received an email last week informing me of an upcoming inspection to see how the bats are getting on – which will cost me a further £195.
I phoned the ecologist, who I’d already paid hundreds of pounds to monitor the building work, and told him the bats were fine. I watch them leaving the loft above my house every evening, like Second World War bombers.
I don’t have £195, but apparently it is the LAW.
Building the bat sanctuary was imposed on me in the first place. Defra insisted on it as part of a project to convert a barn to provide low-cost housing for an agricultural worker, a building that was still slapped with 17 per cent, and then 20 per cent, VAT.
Isn’t this interesting – the care we lavish on bats, compared to the sort of spying never applied to Victoria Climbie.
You’d think, given the outrage in this country about dogs left in hot cars, that animals are treated fairly here.
But given what’s going on in a leafy suburb in Hertfordshire, I’d counter we are living in the Soviet Bloc rather than 21st Century Britain, where the Government does not listen to us, or even to reason or science.
In this bastion of law-abiding, tax-paying Middle England, a campaign is being mounted to save the Borehamwood 33 – a flock of wild birds descended from 12 monk parakeets that escaped from an aviary during a house burglary 16 years ago.